Caroline Atkins, 33 years old
As a long time New Yorker, I'm convinced that I'd have a ring on my finger right now had I been living in any other American city for the past seven years. But I'm also full of fear of intimacy, terrible at committing, and don't want to be engaged, so there's that too. Is New York just terrible? And if so, what are the best and worst cities for dating? Last Valentine's Day, residential real estate site Trulia. Trulia took multiple factors into account in determining which cities had best and worst cities for dating 2013 most eligible singles including the ratio of single men to single women over the age of 21, the age range of those singles, whether they've been married or not, how often they work each week, and what level of education they have.
Sorry, singles, but these cities just aren't that into you. The places that are ranked poor for the unmarried may be quite lovely for couples, families or retirees. But based on economic and demographic factors, we found these cities to be far from perfect matches for resident bachelors and bachelorettes. How did we come up best and worst cities for dating 2013 our list of the worst cities for singles?
If you're single, looking for a partner in your city can be easy or difficult, depending on a number best and worst cities for dating 2013 factors. WalletHub, the Washington D. San Francisco, while it's the third most expensive city on the list, ranked three and four for fun and recreation and dating opportunities, respectively, so it grabbed the top spot. The study was done by measuring several factors that have to do with how easy dating can be. The economics of an area, what sort of fun and recreation it offers and dating opportunities were the three categories they used, each given a ranking.
Best and worst cities for dating 2013
More about best and worst cities for dating 2013:
Finding love sounds super tiring, but if you feel like you have to do it, we don't want you exhausting yourself in vain. In short, check out one of these cities -- the top cities for singles in America. Check out the full ranking herebut we've got the top 10 and bottom 10 listed out below, plus a handy map from WalletHub so you can get the big picture on the country's big love-ready heart. To use this map, just hover over a location to see its ranking. The darker best and worst cities for dating 2013 dot, the better that city is for singles. Portland, Maine 9. Minneapolis 8. San Diego 7. Chicago 6. Seattle 5.
The study is based on criteria that includes percentage of singles agespopulation density, best and worst cities for dating 2013 dating venues per capita such as concerts, coffee shops, bars, bowling alleys, etc. We teamed up with AXE Deodorant Bodyspray, which specializes in the dating game, to find out which city is revered as the D. Dating Capital of the U. Yee haw! Austin, Texas, tops the list of best cities to play the dating game. Is the city you call home the place to find that special someone? Austin, TX 2. Colorado Springs, CO 3. San Diego, CA 4.
You may be looking for love in all the wrong places — literally. A new report says it's not you, it's where you live. Here's what the company determined to be the top 10 best best and worst cities for dating 2013 for singles:. That San Francisco is number one may come as a bit of a surprise. After all, it's regularly billed as one of the most expensive U. Wouldn't it be tougher for singles to mingle in such a high-cost environment? Yes and no, and ultimately, the pros outweigh the cons. What also helped San Fran move to the top of the list is "the sheer number of singles that are there," said Gonzalez.